JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)November 18, 2015

A- de 2015

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice María Victoria Calle Correa

✓Claimant Ministro De Hacienda Y Credito Publico

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Solicitud De Apertura De Incidente De Impacto Fiscal
  • Se inadmite la apertura del incidente de impacto fiscal solicitado por el Ministro de Hacienda y Crédito Público y se le otorga un plazo para que corrija el escrito de sustentación
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Con el presente auto se declara inadmisible la sustentación del incidente de impacto fiscal presentado por el Ministro de Hacienda y Crédito Público respecto de la sentencia C-492/15.

Se concede al precitado Ministro el término de cinco días hábiles para que corrija el escrito de sustentación y aporte los elementos de juicios faltantes, los cuales fueron indicados en la presente providencia.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. Declarar INADMISIBLE, tal como está, la sustentación del incidente de impacto fiscal presentado por el Ministro de Hacienda y Crédito Público respecto de la sentencia C-492 de 2015.
  2. Segundo. OTORGAR al Ministro de Hacienda y Crédito Público el término de cinco (5) días hábiles para que corrija el escrito de sustentación y aportes los elementos de juicio indicados en la presente providencia.
  3. Tercero. Contra el presente auto procede reposición, de acuerdo con el artículo 8º de la Ley 1695 de 2013.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.